Shell marketing consultant quits, accusing firm of ‘excessive harms’ to atmosphere | Shell

A senior safety advisor has give up working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil gas producer in a bombshell public video of causing “excessive harms” to the environment.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for climate change dangers” and urged others within the oil and fuel business to “walk away while there’s still time”.

The executive, who works for the impartial agency Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 staff. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she mentioned she had stop because of Shell’s “double-talk on local weather”.

Dennett accused the oil and gasoline firm of “operating past the design limits of our planetary systems” and “not putting environmental security earlier than manufacturing”.

She stated: “Shell’s said safety ambition is to ‘do no hurt’ – ‘Purpose Zero’, they name it – and it sounds honourable however they're fully failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gas extraction causes extreme harms, to our local weather, to our environment and to individuals. And no matter they say, Shell is solely not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett informed the Guardian she “couldn't marry these conflicts with my conscience”, including: “I could not carry that any longer, and I’m able to take care of the results.”

Shell was a “major client” of Dennett’s business, which specialises in evaluating safety procedures in high-risk industries together with oil and gasoline manufacturing. She started working with Shell in the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the industry.

“I can now not work for a corporation that ignores all the alarms and dismisses the dangers of climate change and ecological collapse,” she said. “As a result of, opposite to Shell’s public expressions around net zero, they aren't winding down on oil and gasoline, but planning to discover and extract way more.”

Dennett – a felony justice graduate who has spent her profession in research and consultancy – was inspired to cease working with Shell after watching information footage of Extinction Rebel local weather protesters urging the corporate’s staff to go away. The motion’s TruthTeller whistleblowing challenge encourages oil and gasoline employees to walk away from the industry.

The consultant, who runs inside safety surveys and relies in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to have the ability to stroll away and “many individuals working in fossil gasoline corporations simply aren’t so lucky”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look within the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they actually consider their vision for extra oil and gasoline extraction secures a protected future for humanity”.

In late 2020, several Shell executives in its clear energy sector left amid experiences they had been frustrated at the pace of Shell’s shift in the direction of greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to scale back emissions will be mentioned at the meeting where the Dutch activist group Follow This can push for the corporate’s policies to be more per the Paris climate accord. Shell’s board has told investors to reject the group’s decision that asks it to set extra stringent climate objectives.

The Shell investor Royal London has said it intends to abstain on a vote on the firm’s climate transition proposals.

The Shell chief government, Ben van Beurden, could expertise an investor rise up against his £13.5m pay packet at the AGM after the investment adviser Pirc urged a vote in opposition to it.

Sign as much as the daily Enterprise At this time e mail or follow Guardian Enterprise on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson stated: “Be in no doubt, we are determined to ship on our global technique to be a web zero firm by 2050 and thousands of our individuals are working laborious to attain this. We've got set targets for the short, medium and long term, and have every intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon power, although the world will still want oil and gas for decades to come in sectors that may’t be simply decarbonised.”

Shell additionally faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to family bills after the power business reported bumper earnings fuelled by the increase in market prices, prompting opposition events to call on the government to herald a one-off levy.

On Monday, the biggest oil and gas producer within the North Sea spoke out against a one-off levy, arguing it will result in the industry approving fewer tasks.

Harbour Energy’s chief govt, Linda Prepare dinner, informed the Financial Instances: “A higher tax burden will make it more challenging for brand new oil and fuel initiatives to meet investment hurdle rates, that means fewer initiatives might be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when business is being inspired to extend home UK oil and gasoline production and assist an orderly power transition.”

Harbour has informed the federal government it plans to take a position $6bn within the North Sea over three years as business makes its case in opposition to the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook dinner had obtained a £4.6m “golden whats up” from the agency.