Shell consultant quits, accusing agency of ‘extreme harms’ to setting | Shell

A senior safety marketing consultant has give up working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil fuel producer in a bombshell public video of inflicting “extreme harms” to the surroundings.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for local weather change risks” and urged others in the oil and fuel industry to “walk away while there’s nonetheless time”.

The manager, who works for the independent agency Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 staff. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she said she had stop because of Shell’s “double-talk on climate”.

Dennett accused the oil and fuel firm of “working past the design limits of our planetary systems” and “not putting environmental security earlier than production”.

She mentioned: “Shell’s stated security ambition is to ‘do no hurt’ – ‘Objective Zero’, they name it – and it sounds honourable but they're completely failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gasoline extraction causes excessive harms, to our climate, to the environment and to folks. And no matter they say, Shell is solely not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett told the Guardian she “could not marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I could not carry that any longer, and I’m able to cope with the consequences.”

Shell was a “major consumer” of Dennett’s enterprise, which specialises in evaluating safety procedures in high-risk industries together with oil and gas production. She started working with Shell within the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the business.

“I can now not work for a company that ignores all of the alarms and dismisses the risks of climate change and ecological collapse,” she said. “As a result of, opposite to Shell’s public expressions round web zero, they are not winding down on oil and gas, however planning to explore and extract far more.”

Dennett – a felony justice graduate who has spent her profession in analysis and consultancy – was impressed to cease working with Shell after watching information footage of Extinction Riot climate protesters urging the corporate’s staff to go away. The motion’s TruthTeller whistleblowing undertaking encourages oil and fuel staff to walk away from the industry.

The marketing consultant, who runs internal security surveys and relies in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to be able to walk away and “many individuals working in fossil gasoline companies simply aren’t so lucky”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look within the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they actually imagine their vision for more oil and fuel extraction secures a secure future for humanity”.

In late 2020, several Shell executives in its clear energy sector left amid reports they had been pissed off at the pace of Shell’s shift towards greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to reduce emissions will probably be mentioned on the meeting where the Dutch activist group Follow This can push for the company’s policies to be extra in keeping with the Paris climate accord. Shell’s board has told buyers to reject the group’s resolution that asks it to set extra stringent local weather objectives.

The Shell investor Royal London has said it intends to abstain on a vote on the agency’s climate transition proposals.

The Shell chief government, Ben van Beurden, might expertise an investor rise up towards his £13.5m pay packet at the AGM after the investment adviser Pirc urged a vote towards it.

Sign as much as the every day Enterprise At present e mail or comply with Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson said: “Be in little question, we are determined to ship on our global strategy to be a web zero company by 2050 and 1000's of our people are working hard to attain this. We have set targets for the brief, medium and long term, and have each intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon vitality, although the world will still want oil and fuel for decades to return in sectors that can’t be simply decarbonised.”

Shell additionally faces the prospect of a possible windfall tax to fund cuts to household payments after the energy business reported bumper profits fuelled by the increase in market prices, prompting opposition parties to call on the government to herald a one-off levy.

On Monday, the largest oil and gasoline producer in the North Sea spoke out against a one-off levy, arguing it could result in the business approving fewer tasks.

Harbour Energy’s chief govt, Linda Cook, instructed the Monetary Instances: “A higher tax burden will make it more difficult for new oil and gasoline tasks to satisfy investment hurdle charges, which means fewer projects will be sanctioned.

“That is at a time when industry is being inspired to increase home UK oil and fuel manufacturing and support an orderly energy transition.”

Harbour has told the federal government it plans to take a position $6bn in the North Sea over three years as business makes its case against the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Prepare dinner had obtained a £4.6m “golden hi there” from the agency.